Journal Policies

The International Journal of Progressive Dental Research and Innovation (IJPDRI) is dedicated to maintaining high standards of integrity, ethics, and transparency. We focus on advancing dental and medical knowledge, encouraging inclusivity, innovation, and academic excellence. Our key policies include:

Scope and Content
We accept a wide range of manuscripts including:
- Original Research Articles
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- Clinical Studies and Trials
- Case Reports
- Critical Commentaries and Opinion Pieces
- Innovations in Clinical Practice and Public Health
  Manuscripts must be relevant to health research and contribute significantly to existing knowledge.
Publication Frequency
IJPDRI is a biannual journal, releasing diverse issues that showcase cutting-edge research and scholarly discussions.
Open Access Policy
IJPDRI follows an open access model, ensuring free, worldwide access to all published content, boosting visibility and citation of authors’ work.
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review to ensure the quality and validity of research. At least two independent experts review each submission, with the editorial board making the final decision.
Ethical Standards
We adhere to the highest ethical guidelines. Any violations may lead to manuscript rejection or retraction.
Authorship and Contribution
All authors must make significant contributions to research, including study design, data collection, and manuscript preparation. Authorship changes post-submission must be justified.
Conflict of Interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect the review process.
Data Sharing and Reproducibility
We encourage authors to share data and methods to enhance transparency and reproducibility of findings.
Copyright and Licensing
Authors retain copyright while granting IJPDRI publishing rights.
Advertising and Sponsorship
Advertisements and sponsorships must align with the journal’s values and may be rejected if deemed inappropriate.
Contact and Communication
Queries can be directed to the editorial office at: athenafoundationindia@gmail.com.

Peer Review Process

Submission
Authors must submit manuscripts through our online portal with the following documents:
- Manuscript
- Cover letter
- Copyright letter
- Ethical approval
- Conflict of interest statement
- Funding information
Initial Screening
The editorial office reviews submissions for alignment with journal guidelines, scientific relevance, and overall clarity.
Reviewer Selection
After passing initial screening, manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are chosen based on qualifications, experience, and lack of conflict of interest.
Peer Review
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on:
- Originality
- Plagiarism (acceptable under 15%)
- Methodology
  Constructive feedback is provided, and recommendations for acceptance, minor/major revisions, or rejection are given.
Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes a decision: accept, request revisions, or reject. Authors are informed with reviewer comments.
Revision Process
Authors must address all reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript within 2-4 weeks for minor revisions, and 6-8 weeks for major revisions.
Final Decision
After revisions, the final decision is made, and accepted manuscripts undergo proofreading and copyediting.
Publication
Accepted manuscripts are prepared for the next available issue after final approval.
Continuous Improvement and Feedback
We actively seek feedback from authors and reviewers to improve the peer review process, ensuring the highest quality of scholarly work.